A curation of articles, essays, book reviews and interviews on critical geographical concerns.
Considers the spatial form and social processes of cities and urbanization with particular attention to the geographies and politics of building theories of the urban.
Nick Dines’ book is the result of an extended ethnographic and archival research conducted in Naples during and after the second half of the 1990s, a period of intense physical and symbolic restructuring of the city under Mayor Bassolino’s administration known as the Neapolitan renaissance. Through the case of Naples, Dines provides an interesting critique of the literature that illustrates the demise of public space in contemporary western cities, outlining the relational process that constitutes public space through its everyday use and experience, together and beyond policies of control or closure.
This book’s concision and careful scholarship are all the more impressive when dealing with a thinker like Lefebvre, whose work is so voluminous and ranges across so many different substantive topics. On top of these evident strengths, Butler also reads Lefebvre in just the right way (in my opinion). That is, he understands Lefebvre’s work to be primarily an exploration of the possibility of radical politics.
Now, in the post- Cold War era, East and Central European cities are not so much carriers of specific developments, trends or classes, but can be considered showcases or laboratories for post-socialist transformation at large. In "Chasing Warsaw" Monika Grubbauer and Joanna Kusiak try to chase one of these cities and its transformations.
This book presents the ways in which cosmopolitanism was practiced and sustained in them and discusses its decline in nationalistic contexts as well as its transformation in our contemporary globalized world. A sense of nostalgia for something precious being lost underpins this diverse collection of case studies that include the cities of Odessa (three chapters), Tbilisi, Warsaw, Venice, Thessalonica, and Dushanbe.
In the papers that follow, we focus on the temporal dimensions of urban planning. We are particularly interested in the uneven ways in which urban spaces in the present – as (always incomplete) materializations of modernist plans past – present new predicaments not just for social life, but for the craft of planning itself.
In this article, I consider the relationship between urban planning and context by investigating the planning practices associated with a land-use plan in Bordeaux described as “adapted to context.”
Homing in on the protracted landscape of construction, I am concerned with how urban experts in Taksim 360, who do not entirely concur with the seemingly determined trajectory of urban transformation in Tarlabaşı, put inevitability to work. I ask: what makes urban experts stay with a project that might not materialize?
Has modernism evolved from a means to create a utopian future to an architectural discontent co-opted for racist purposes? The planners who built mid-20th century Scandinavian, modernist suburbs conceived of them as places of innovation, possibility, and visionary thinking.
In this article, I describe Mumbai’s sea as an “anthroposea” – a sea made with ongoing anthropogenic processes across landwaters – to draw attention to the ways in which it troubles both urban planning and the making of environmental futures.